No True Christian
On Christianity, Fallacies, and Colonized Minds
“I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.” - Adolf Hitler
Christianity existed for three centuries as a persecuted minority religion before Roman co-option transformed it into the imperial doctrine we recognize today.
If Christianity existed today in its original form, it would be considered a cult, similar to the many cults that are persecuted by Christian majority Republican rule. When you hear somebody like Charles Manson or the leader of Scientology rant on about the bizarre aspects of their religion, and then you read the Bible comparatively, it’s equally esoteric and strange. That is because Christianity was started by a small cult of people and persecuted exactly the same—exactly in every way the same—as the way that Jim Jones, Charles Manson, and other cult leaders have been persecuted. Christianity only started to be adopted by a state when it benefited the state. The faith that emerged from this period bore little resemblance to the standardized doctrine that would later dominate the Western world.
In 325 CE, Emperor Constantine I convened the Council of Nicaea with an explicitly political goal: to unify Christian doctrine across a fragmenting empire. Constantine understood that religious unity could serve as the foundation for political unity, and he used imperial power to settle theological disputes—particularly the conflict between Arianism and Trinitarian theology—in favor of what would become orthodox Christianity. This was not a spiritual decision but a calculated act of statecraft.
The transformation was completed in 380 CE when Emperor Theodosius I issued the Edict of Thessalonica, making Nicene Christianity the official state religion of Rome. From that point forward, the empire actively suppressed alternative Christian sects—Gnostics, Arians, and others—that didn’t conform to the imperially sanctioned version. What we recognize as Christianity today is not the original grassroots cult that spread through the ancient world, but rather a Roman imperial construct designed to consolidate power under the principle that one god serves one emperor.
A psychological operation, commonly abbreviated as “psyop,” is a deliberate campaign designed to influence the perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors of a target population in order to achieve specific political, military, or social objectives. Psyops work by controlling information, manipulating narratives, and shaping beliefs to serve the interests of those in power. These operations can involve propaganda, disinformation, the selective presentation of facts, or the creation of entirely new belief systems that align with the goals of the controlling entity. The key characteristic of a psyop is that it operates on the level of consciousness itself—changing not just what people do, but how they think and what they believe to be true.
Historical examples of psychological operations are well-documented and undeniable. More recently, declassified documents have revealed programs like COINTELPRO, where the FBI systematically worked to discredit and neutralize political movements through disinformation and psychological manipulation. These aren’t conspiracy theories—they’re documented historical facts that demonstrate how power structures have repeatedly used psychological operations to control populations, shape reality, and maintain authority.
The vast majority of human history has not been Christian, but it has remained moral in one way or another. Human civilization would simply collapse without any sense of morality. It stands to reason that human beings who have never traded with or been colonized by Christians still understand that murder is wrong, that harming children is wrong. They still have marriage. They still have fidelity. They still have religious ceremony. They still have respect for their elders. All of those accoutrements that Christians like to pretend is civilization—which they believe they brought to the world.
I believe it was Joseph Campbell who recounted the story of Christian missionaries visiting India when it was predominantly Hindu. The missionaries said, “You all need to worship this new savior, Jesus Christ.” And the Hindus said, “Okay, we will incorporate Jesus into our large pantheon of many gods.” And the missionaries said, “No, you must worship Jesus as the one, the only one.” This baffled Hindus because they couldn’t possibly understand how there could be only one god. Meanwhile, Hinduism is 2,000 years older than Christianity and has a holy trinity, a savior god, and an enemy of humanity god—all the same features as Christianity.
Truth is not a democracy. When untrue reasoning enters hegemonic thought, disasters occur.
Christians treat their faith as though it is a humble and sweet doctrine, and hating it is tantamount to being a Satanist, just as aggressive capitalists make people work for slave labor and deny them healthcare and benefits, then say if you are opposed, you are a Socialist.
Christianity is not humble and sweet, it is the most vicious and incomplete doctrine to ever conquer the world. If Christians understood that, the world would be a much more peaceful and kind place. But they do not.
When a white Christian woman sitting in a suburb watches a Hallmark movie, followed by a movie about Jesus near Christmas, the obligatory feeling is that of religiosity, of genuflection, and of sanctity. They believe that Jesus is the reason for the season and is informing them of a kind of sensation of moral truth and good winning over evil. Nothing could be further from the truth. Whatever belief system was hegemonic in different societies led to what was the accepted morality. This is the fundamental conceit of hegemony.
Hegemony is the dominance of one group, ideology, or culture over others, achieved not primarily through force but through the normalization of that dominant group’s values, beliefs, and worldview as universal truth. It operates by making the beliefs and practices of the powerful appear natural, inevitable, and morally correct, so that even those who are oppressed by the system come to accept and reproduce it. In the context of Christianity in the West, hegemony means that Christian moral frameworks, holidays, symbols, and assumptions are so deeply embedded in the culture that they’re perceived as simply “the way things are” rather than as one particular worldview among many. The dominant group’s perspective becomes invisible as ideology and instead appears as common sense, objective reality, or universal morality—when in fact it’s merely the belief system of those who hold power, imposed on everyone else through centuries of cultural, political, and economic control.
Christians did not bring civilization to the world. They brought mass murder via the Crusades and the Catholic Inquisition. They brought disease and the raping and pillaging of native peoples all over the world. White Europeans only make up 8% of the entire planet’s population, yet a belief system that spread throughout Europe about 1700 years ago has been a disaster for the populations of humanity all over the world. Yet because it is the populous one and the language of spirituality of Western capitalist nations, it has become the predominant philosophy in America—at least for now, perhaps the largest economic powerhouse. I would argue that in the 21st century, it will not be so, and thus Christianity will wane from the world stage. But I would also argue that Christianity in its death rattle is just as facetious and artificial as it always was.
So many Christians walk around this Babylonian marketplace, this country in which we can buy prostitutes in Nevada, in which we can gamble in Las Vegas, in which we can buy and sell usury on Wall Street, in which we have to pretty much participate in usury to have a mortgage.
They believe that wearing a little cross—a symbol of the means of Jesus’ murder (which must be very strange for people who are strangers in this land) justifies a morality that is somehow kinder, sweeter, or more compassionate. Meanwhile, this entire civilization is built on the backs of African American slaves, Native American genocides, etc. just for white Americans to have a comfortable place to buy and sell on a stock market, so that they can have nice clothes and listen to Christmas music on the winter solstice, which by any historian’s account would not be Jesus’ birthday.
Remember, white Europeans make up only 8% of the world’s population, yet have built their comfort on the suffering of everyone else.
A large part of the problem with the Christian mindset, especially in America, is that it doesn’t properly use logic and reason in applying basic understanding of philosophy to its belief system.
Christians are narrow-minded, and most Christians who belong to sects like Catholicism are essentially bullies. You will watch them bully if you get in an argument with them. In the age of social media, you can see threads upon threads of arguments made about Christianity. You can join a group in which people have theological debates, and in almost every case, you can see people who identify as Christian are not capable of rational argument.
Ad hominem is a logical fallacy. Keep in mind that when you make an argument, there’s form to argument. If you commit a fallacy, you are losing the argument—you are committing a fallacious argument. If all of your premises do not follow in your argument, your argument is invalid. If one false premise is in your argument, your argument is false. This system of understanding reason and logic has existed before Christianity. It was created by Greco-Roman philosophers predominantly. This style of debate is what argument really is. Argument is not fighting with somebody you don’t like. Argument is a discussion with the assumed desire to reach the truth through complex reasoning. This is not what Christians are trying to do.
This country that you live in, the United States, would be 100% Native American if not for Christians and Christian missionaries turning it into a mere 1% Native American through mass killing, enslaving, and torturing. The torturing was so bad, the treatment was so brutal, that settlers were more likely to patronize a shop that had a Native American’s scalp displayed in the window. And everyone who participated in that was Christian.
Christians cannot prove anything about Christianity—obviously, or it would be absolutely empirically understood to be true. Let’s examine just ten claims from the Bible that can be empirically disproven if taken literally rather than metaphorically: (1) The sun standing still in the sky for Joshua (Joshua 10:12-13)—the Earth’s rotation cannot simply stop without catastrophic global consequences. (2) A global flood covering all mountains (Genesis 7-8)—there is no geological evidence for such an event, and the water required doesn’t exist on Earth. (3) The Earth being created before the sun (Genesis 1)—astrophysics proves stars form before planets. (4) All languages originating from the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11)—linguistics traces language families back tens of thousands of years through completely different evolutionary paths. (5) The Earth being approximately 6,000 years old based on Biblical genealogies—radiometric dating proves the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. (6) All animal species fitting on Noah’s Ark—there are millions of species, and the logistical impossibility of housing, feeding, and managing them is staggering. (7) Humans being created from dust and a rib (Genesis 2)—evolutionary biology and genetics prove human evolution from common ancestors. (8) Stars falling to Earth (Revelation 6:13)—stars are massive celestial bodies millions of times larger than Earth. (9) The firmament—a solid dome over the Earth holding back waters above (Genesis 1:6-7)—we know the sky is atmosphere and space, not a physical dome. (10) Mustard seeds being the smallest of all seeds (Matthew 13:32)—orchid seeds are smaller, and Jesus would have known this if he were omniscient.
What Christians do is perpetually use the same logical fallacies over and over again, and by understanding them, you can dismantle and dethread every Christian argument. Number one is ad hominem. They’ll always attack the person, not the argument. They’ll always say, “This guy has a bad haircut and ugly shoes. He might be a scientist saying that the earth is actually umpteen million years old, but because he’s not looking normal, he must be crazy, stupid, or socially unacceptable.” They do the same thing to women with blue hair, people with tattoos, people with piercings. What about having a piercing or a tattoo makes you not Christian? I’m aware of the Bible passages that they try to justify that with. The same Bible says you shouldn’t eat shellfish. The same Bible says women shouldn’t speak in church. The same Bible says women should cover their hair in church. The same Bible says it’s okay to have slaves. Any Christian denying any of that is flatly wrong. There is such a thing as right and wrong. There is such a thing as true and false, and those can be understood through logic and reason. When you understand them, there’s no chance—zero percent chance at all—that you would ever be Christian again.
When you get into an argument with a Christian, they will inevitably come to you with quotes from the Bible, videos by Christian theologians, articles written by Catholic priests, etcetera, trying to prove their case—without ever comprehending the simple logical reality that you cannot defend a case with elements of the case. You cannot defend an argument with elements of the argument. If the argument is “God is real, and the Bible is true,” you cannot defend it by saying “the Bible says so” or “people who believe in God say it’s true.” That’s illogical, irrational, and a logical fallacy that predates the scientific method. It’s so old and wrong that any college graduate should be aware that they are committing a serious atrocity, similar to not being able to drive a car but veering into traffic. Yet Christians, with their minds loaded with incomplete thoughts, superstitions, and overconfidence, do in fact veer into traffic, not having the slightest clue how to argue—stuffed with circular logic and trying to prove the Bible is true by saying the Bible is true.
Christians are not innocent, loving, caring, compassionate people. Christians the world over have mass murdered more people than any other religion and all other religions combined. The Crusades alone resulted in between one to three million deaths. The Spanish Inquisition tortured and executed tens of thousands in the name of religious purity. The Catholic missions throughout the Americas—California, New Mexico, Texas, and South America—enslaved indigenous peoples, forced conversions, and spread diseases that decimated populations. The colonization of Africa by Christian European powers resulted in the deaths of millions through slavery, forced labor, and brutal exploitation. The Thirty Years’ War, a religious conflict between Catholics and Protestants in Europe, killed approximately eight million people. The witch trials across Europe and colonial America, rooted in Christian dogma, led to the torture and execution of tens of thousands of women. The Manifest Destiny doctrine, deeply rooted in Protestant Christianity, justified the genocide of Native Americans as settlers expanded westward across the continent.
I would very strongly argue that if not for Christianity, we would never have a Calvinist sense that good people are made rich by God—what is now referred to as the prosperity gospel. And thus, we would never vote in leaders like George W. Bush, who started the War on Terror under false claims of weapons of mass destruction that led to four million total deaths. Hitler, who absolutely and undeniably was Catholic—and you can cite over 50 quotes from Mein Kampf and other sources where he says that what he is doing is a Christian cause informed by God—killed six million people. Comparably, George Bush is pretty close with his four million.
Christians always like to say that atheists are responsible for socialism, and that socialism is responsible for mass death. Hard disagree. The vast majority of tyrants in this world have cited Christianity as the cause and reason for their mass slaughter. That is because Christianity is the first psychological operation. Anyone who is subject to a belief system that a dead Jew lives in the sky from 2,000 years ago and blesses people in a capitalist free market economy for just wishing inside their mind that, in a Hollywood way, good things happen to good people and bad things happen to bad people, is insane. They’re suffering from delusions, and they will subsequently perform against the rules of engagement for debate.
For instance, they will always use the No True Scotsman fallacy. They will say, “Sure, Hitler said he was Catholic, but because he killed a bunch of people, and God in the Bible forbids killing, he was clearly not Catholic.” That is a logical fallacy, and as soon as you say that, you’ve lost the debate because you don’t know how to argue. The truth is that Christians do that over and over and over again, but yet they always support the next tyrant—vis-à-vis Bush, for instance. I was 18 years old, and Bush had 80 to 90% evangelical support, and they voted for him twice, supported the War on Terror, believed that scimitar-wielding bad guys did 9/11, and that blowing up sheep herders with bunker-busting bombs is justified. It never was justified for one day. Though I wasn’t alive for Vietnam, I can presume it was a similar arrangement.
Murder of any kind makes you not a Christian. If you are a murderer, you are not a Christian. Yet mass murderers are supported by a predominantly Christian base because this version of Christianity that they all pass around is not actually the Christianity of Jesus Christ. I argue personally it’s the Demiurge, Saturn, or Satan in disguise. Gnostics, a sect that was around at the same time as Christ, argued that the world is fundamentally flawed and created by an evil, twisted, lying god. And the real hard-nosed facts on Christianity and Judaism seem to support that. But that god tricks you into believing he’s the only god—see the commandment in which he says there’ll be no other gods but me. He tricks you into believing in a materialist world, a world that’s surely material. That philosophy certainly makes sense when you look at the actual results of people who sponsor this farcical fascism that is Christofascism.
The distinction between the “Old Covenant” and the “New Covenant” is central to Christian theology. The Old Covenant refers to the Mosaic Law—the 613 commandments given to Moses in the Old Testament, including dietary restrictions, ritual purity laws, and moral codes that governed Jewish life. The New Covenant, established through Jesus Christ in the New Testament, is presented as a replacement based on faith and grace rather than adherence to Old Testament law. This theological shift allowed Christianity to expand beyond Judaism and attract Gentile converts who didn’t want to follow Jewish dietary laws or circumcision requirements.
However, Christians have applied this distinction with wild inconsistency and convenient selectivity. They cite the New Covenant to ignore Old Testament laws they find inconvenient—eating shellfish, wearing mixed fabrics, getting tattoos—while simultaneously invoking Old Testament passages when it suits their agenda, such as citing Leviticus to condemn homosexuality. The New Testament itself contains numerous passages that modern American Christians conveniently ignore because they’re incompatible with contemporary values, revealing that Christian morality isn’t based on consistent biblical interpretation but rather on cherry-picking verses that align with pre-existing cultural preferences and power structures.
The New Testament—the supposed foundation of the New Covenant that Christians claim liberates them from outdated Old Testament laws—is filled with commandments that are absolutely incompatible with modern American life and values. Paul commands that women must keep silent in churches and are not permitted to speak, and that women cannot teach or have authority over men but must learn in silence. Women are commanded to cover their heads in church, and wives must submit to their husbands as the husband is the head of the wife just as Christ is the head of the church. The New Testament explicitly endorses slavery, commanding servants to obey their masters with fear and trembling, and telling slaves not to seek freedom but to accept their bondage. It goes further, instructing slaves to accept beatings from cruel masters as a form of Christian witness, enduring grief and suffering wrongfully for conscience toward God.
Jesus himself commands his followers not to resist evil but to turn the other cheek when struck, and demands that anyone who comes to him must hate their father, mother, wife, children, and siblings—and even their own life—or they cannot be his disciple. He equates thought crimes with actual crimes, declaring that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery in his heart, and recommends self-mutilation as a solution to sin, saying if your eye or hand causes you to sin, you should pluck it out or cut it off. Jesus tells his followers to abandon their families for his sake, to take no thought for tomorrow, to sell everything they have and give it to the poor. And perhaps most damning for American Christianity: Jesus explicitly states that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.
These are not Old Covenant laws. These are New Covenant commandments directly from Jesus Christ and his apostles. When Christians try to claim that the New Covenant liberates them from Old Testament restrictions on slavery, misogyny, and rigid moral codes, they are completely missing—or deliberately ignoring—what the New Testament itself actually says. The New Testament doesn’t liberate anyone from slavery; it endorses it. It doesn’t free women from patriarchal subjugation; it reinforces and codifies it. And it explicitly condemns wealth accumulation, which means that every prosperity gospel preacher, every Republican president of the 20th and 21st centuries, every megachurch pastor with a private jet, and every Christian who supports capitalism and wealth hoarding is living in direct violation of Jesus’s explicit teachings. They cannot enter heaven according to their own supposed savior. The New Covenant doesn’t make Christianity more humane or reasonable—it makes Christians hypocrites for pretending they follow it while ignoring every inconvenient word.
Usury, by biblical definition, is the practice of charging interest on loans. The Bible explicitly and repeatedly condemns this practice. Exodus 22:25 states: “If you lend money to any of my people with you who is poor, you shall not be like a moneylender to him, and you shall not exact interest from him.” Leviticus 25:36-37 commands: “Take no interest from him or profit, but fear your God, that your brother may live beside you. You shall not lend him your money at interest, nor give him your food for profit.” Deuteronomy 23:19 reinforces this: “You shall not charge interest on loans to your brother, interest on money, interest on food, interest on anything that is lent for interest.” Ezekiel 18:13 goes so far as to condemn usurers to death: “If he has lent at interest, and has taken profit; shall he then live? He shall not live. He has done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon himself.”
In the United States, the entire financial system is built on usury. Mortgages, car loans, credit cards, student loans, business financing—all charge interest, often at rates that would have been considered criminal in previous eras. The average credit card interest rate hovers around 20-24%. Mortgage interest accumulates to the point where borrowers often pay nearly double the original loan amount over 30 years. Student loan debt traps millions of Americans in decades of interest payments. By contrast, Islamic finance prohibits riba (usury/interest) entirely, structuring loans as profit-sharing partnerships or asset-backed transactions where the lender shares risk with the borrower rather than extracting guaranteed profit through interest. A true Christian, following biblical law as literally as they claim to, could not participate in any modern banking, could not have a mortgage, could not carry a credit card, and could not work in finance or lending. Yet these same Christians who condemn tattoos and blue hair as violations of Leviticus participate daily in a financial system that the Bible condemns as worthy of death.
On war, the Bible is equally clear. The Sixth Commandment states simply: “Thou shalt not kill” (Exodus 20:13). Jesus himself said in Matthew 5:9: “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.” Matthew 5:44 commands: “But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” Matthew 26:52 warns: “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.” Romans 12:19-21 instructs: “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’ To the contrary, ‘if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.’ Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” Yet American Christians have supported every war, every bombing campaign, every drone strike, every act of state violence committed by the United States. They wave flags and thank soldiers for their service while those soldiers drop bombs on wedding parties and hospitals in countries that never attacked us. A Christian who supports war, who supports the military, who celebrates violence against America’s enemies, is not following Christ—they are following Caesar, following Rome, following the same imperial death cult that crucified Jesus in the first place.
Whatever you do in America, you have to do under facetious, Christian rule- if you invent a new branch of mathematics, people in America still expect you to celebrate Christmas. If you are an avant garde nutritionist, people still expect you to earn capitalist, protestant wages.
Christians in America all have a belief system, and it results in certain outcomes. That belief system is incredibly anachronistic, perverse, a twisted rendition of Jesus Christ’s teachings. First and foremost, the cacophony—the many hypocritical aspects of believing that an empire driven by economic, financial power and military might is somehow on the side of the very humble and humility-based philosophy that Christianity represents.
For anyone initiated into mystery school realities, you’re well aware that Christianity is essentially an Age of Pisces religion. There’s a 2,000-year period before Christianity that was really represented by the avatar of Moses, and that’s the Age of Aries. And so there were Aries-oriented symbologies throughout most religions—like a ram’s horn being a shofar to blow the call to prayer. In Christianity’s case, there’s all kinds of fishes: loaves and fishes, walking on water, 12 apostles as in the 12 signs of the zodiac, and so on and so forth. That imagery is not an accident. That is because the religious priests of the time knew the Age of Pisces was coming, and it’s a 2,000-year era—much like the events of September 11th, 2001, which was the inauguration of the Aquarian era, coincidentally 2,000 years or an astrological age’s length away.
The Age of Pisces would be represented by compassion as passion. The Age of Pisces would be about spirituality, as spirit is represented by the sign of Pisces in the zodiac. All of those things are covered by a million people other than me, but most fundamentally, if you understand the astrotheology, you understand that the Age of Pisces is represented by Jesus.
Jesus is not now, nor was he ever meant to be, the eternal savior of all time. That’s anachronistic, dubiously selective, and insane. There was a father figure in Moses for the Age of Aries, and there will be a new one for the Age of Aquarius.
But going back to logical fallacies, Christians always commit No True Scotsman: (1) No real Christian would kill anyone or do whatever terrible thing the Christian leader did. (2) Hitler and other Christian leaders commit crimes and atrocities that do not align with Jesus Christ’s values. (3) Therefore, Hitler and other leaders aren’t Christians. That’s false. That argument is false because it contains a fallacy, and the fallacy is that there is a constant moving of the solid ground that defines what Christianity is.
If you think that because someone murders, they’re not Christian, you shouldn’t have voted for Bush, Obama, or Trump. If you think that Robert Morris, the Trump-associated pastor who resigned from his Texas megachurch after admitting to sexually abusing a 12-year-old girl in the 1980s, should be defended or excused, then you are not Christian yourself.
This pattern isn’t isolated to Robert Morris. Christians use the same moral playbook over and over, and get the same results consequently. And so, they continuously shelter pedophiles and financial abusers of all sorts, then say anyone who does those things is NOT Christian, yet Christians keep doing it- leaving only non-Christians to pick up the bill for those abuses.
Dennis Hastert, the longest-serving Republican Speaker of the House in history, was convicted in 2016 for structuring bank withdrawals to cover up his sexual abuse of teenage boys when he was a high school wrestling coach. Ted Haggard, who served as George W. Bush’s spiritual adviser and led the National Association of Evangelicals representing 30 million Christians, was exposed in 2006 for having a three-year sexual relationship with a male prostitute while using methamphetamine—all while publicly condemning homosexuality and advocating for anti-gay policies.
Christians believe that they are building their morality on a solid foundation because the opposite of Christian behavior, especially in the West, appears to be immoral. Yet, this is a false dichotomy, in that there are hundreds of behaviors condoned by real life Christians that do not reflect that morality, and there are thousands of behaviors not quantified as good or evil, yet objectively ‘evil’ behavior permeates Christian behavior, leading them back to the manufactured pole of ‘good’ as presented by the hegemonic religion, Christianity.
Until you critically evaluate how the world really works, it’s hard to have any basis of true morality. A religion that won’t accept science, astrology, other religions, or modern culture, probably lacks the tools to understand anything infinite.
Cutting part of an infant’s penis off seems evil, until it is sanctioned by the religion that claims to have a trademark on good and evil, and then it is normalized. This is Hegemony 101.
There is an obvious correlation between being Catholic, being conservative, and engaging in behaviors that are deeply antithetical to the very moral code these leaders publicly champion. This isn’t coincidence, though Catholics blindly defend it to be—it’s the inevitable result of repression.
When you force people to uphold a false veneer of purity and righteousness, when you demand they deny fundamental aspects of human nature and sexuality, the pressure creates a powder keg that leads to immorality of all kinds- which puts the perpetrator in a moral trap from which Christianity seems a viable escape.
The more rigidly someone performs moral superiority in public, the more likely they are to be hiding profound contradictions in private. Conservative Christianity doesn’t prevent immoral behavior; it creates the conditions for hypocrisy, repression, and ultimately the very sins it claims to stand against.
There is far too much cognitive dissonance between what it means to be a Republican in America and a Christian according to the Bible, and the two cannot functionally coexist. Proponents only try to force them together so that prosperity and financial success goes along with a loosely dispensational or Protestant ideation of Christianity because that’s woven into the American zeitgeist. That doesn’t make it any more true through the lens of actual Christianity—which it never has been true and never will be true…
Millions of atrocities have been committed in the name of all kinds of fake gods, not just Jesus, all over the world. If people start thinking that everyone needs to be Zoroastrian, then Zoroastrians will take over Asia and kill and rape and pillage and colonize everyone there. It just so happens that Europeans did it in the name of Jesus over and over and over again, and that pilgrims in that society came over to America and did it here again to the Native Americans, to Black people, where they put them in ghettos and redlined suburbs and enslaved them.
If you think that enslaving African Americans is justified, you cannot call yourself a Christian and believe in the compassion that Christians claim to have for all of humanity. Yet it’s always a new thing. Then it was slavery—even the Antebellum South used passages from the Bible that condone slavery in order to defend slavery. Now the idea of Christianity being used to defend slavery sounds contradictory, but there are other contradictions that are happening in the present tense that Christians ignore. That is because Christians don’t actually have morality. The most moral people are anarcho-syndicalist anarchists because they realized that it is the government that is the origin of wickedness in America. It is the Christian right that supports violence and oppression and economic inequality.
The Catholic Church’s sexual abuse crisis is not an aberration—it’s a systemic feature of an institution that prioritizes its own power over the safety of children. Since 1950, the scale of abuse is staggering and well-documented. A 2004 study commissioned by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (the John Jay Report) found that between 1950 and 2002, approximately 10,667 individuals made allegations of child sexual abuse against 4,392 Catholic priests in the United States alone—meaning roughly 4% of all priests serving during that period were accused of abuse. These are only the reported cases. The actual number of victims is almost certainly far higher, as many survivors never come forward due to shame, fear, or the Church’s aggressive legal tactics to silence them.
In 2018, a Pennsylvania grand jury report revealed that over 1,000 children were abused by over 300 priests across six dioceses, with the Church systematically covering up the crimes for decades. Similar investigations across Ireland, Australia, Germany, Chile, and dozens of other countries have revealed the same pattern: abuse, cover-up, and the protection of predators over victims.
The Church’s response has been to shuffle abusive priests between parishes—a practice that allowed predators to abuse hundreds of additional children—and to use its vast wealth and legal power to intimidate victims into silence. The Vatican itself has been complicit, with Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston, who covered up decades of abuse, being given a prestigious position in Rome rather than facing prosecution. As of 2023, the Catholic Church has paid out over $4 billion in settlements to abuse survivors in the United States alone, and yet Pope Francis has repeatedly failed to implement meaningful structural reforms. This is not a few “bad apples”—this is an institution whose hierarchical structure, culture of secrecy, mandatory celibacy, and theological doctrine of absolute clerical authority created the perfect conditions for predators to thrive and for their crimes to be hidden. When Christians talk about morality, they are defending an organization that has systematically enabled the rape of children on a global scale for at least 70 years.
The thing about Christians is that they believe—because someone told them, but obviously with no evidence—that moral good is on the side of Christianity and that other religions are either the devil tricking them or some sort of exotic, strange spiritual set they’ll never understand or comprehend. This is, again, no reason to go off killing masses of people. But in recent decades, Eastern philosophy has been easier to understand because of the proliferation of those ideas thanks to people that Christians condemned, such as Timothy Leary, Alan Watts, and so on. The so-called hippie movement was integral in bringing Eastern philosophy to Western eyes and ears.
Within Eastern philosophy, which is thousands of years older than Christianity—in the case of Hinduism and so forth—there are hand mudras that people do in yoga. Those hand mudras appear all over Christian iconography. There’s Jesus doing hand mudras that represent Jupiter all the time, and this is the origin of the fact that they’re the same thing: Jupiter and Jesus. Jove, Jesus, Jupiter. Saturn, Satan. They’re the same. It’s all planetary religion of Rome, condensed, reduced, and altered for the sake of unifying Romans under one Piscean religion. It’s a tool of the Roman oppressors to keep you in a kind of panopticon of spiritual slavery.
A large part of this state-sanctioned violence that the United States commits, such as fighting in the Middle East, is driven by Christian end-times theology that claims Jesus Christ will return once certain territorial conditions are met in the region.
Every Christian should understand that while Muslims believe that Jesus was a prophet, Jews do not. Jews believe in their own Messiah, and it has nothing to do with Christianity, and it’s not Jesus Christ, statedly. If you are a Christian supporting the state of Israel committing mass slaughter in the Middle East—displacing Palestinians who are indigenous to the region, a displacement that has been ongoing since Israeli expansion began in 1948—so that Israel can have dominance and hegemony in the region, you are being had the same way that a child believes a childish narrative, a kids’ show, in their innocence—except that this one has cost millions of lives and continues to cost millions of lives to this day.
Jesus is not now, nor will he ever, come back. If Jesus came back tomorrow, wouldn’t it be kind of anticlimactic that he didn’t come back during the Holocaust? Or during 9/11? That would have been the millennium and the perfect time. Trust me when I say that people a lot older and wiser than me have watched Jesus not come back hundreds of times all throughout history when people said Jesus was gonna come back. He never does because Jesus is a myth. It’s not real. It’s a myth of control, a myth to control your mind.
So if you believe that someone who has tattoos or blue hair or piercings or smokes marijuana or listens to heavy metal music is somehow departed from true morality, that is because you have the residue of a psyop—a Roman psyop—in your brain. It’s not remotely true. There is no heaven and hell. None of that. But what there is are millions upon millions of peoples all over the world with their own systems of trade, with their own mythology, with their own children and women and churches that Christians the world over have decimated, destroyed, raped, and forced people into slavery—anything terrible you can imagine has been done in the name of Christ. Forced to confess their Christianity lest they be burned in boiling oil. Forced to confess they’re a witch lest they be burned at the stake. That is what Christians do. They go on witch hunts all the time and slay and enslave anyone who disagrees with their belief system. And in microcosm, it’s obvious with every Christian judgment of something as banal and unimportant as taste in music or use of foul language.
Dispensationalism is a theological framework within Protestant Christianity, particularly prevalent among American evangelicals, that divides human history into distinct periods or “dispensations” in which God relates to humanity through different covenants and sets of rules. Originating in the 19th century through the teachings of John Nelson Darby and popularized in the 20th century by the Scofield Reference Bible, dispensationalism asserts that we are currently living in the “Church Age” or “Age of Grace,” which will end with the Rapture—an event where true believers will be taken up to heaven before a seven-year period of tribulation. This theological system is foundational to modern American evangelical support for Israel, as dispensationalists believe that the re-establishment of Israel as a nation in 1948 was a fulfillment of biblical prophecy necessary for Christ’s return.
The most politically consequential aspect of dispensationalism is its end-times theology, which teaches that certain geopolitical conditions must be met before Jesus can return: the Jews must control Jerusalem, the Third Temple must be rebuilt on the Temple Mount, and a final battle (Armageddon) must occur in the Middle East. This belief system has directly influenced American foreign policy, as millions of dispensationalist Christians support unconditional aid to Israel not out of concern for Jewish people, but because they believe Israeli territorial expansion is a prerequisite for the Second Coming. Ironically, this same theology teaches that during the tribulation, Jews who don’t convert to Christianity will be destroyed—meaning that Christian Zionists are essentially supporting Israel to facilitate what they believe will be the eventual mass death or forced conversion of Jewish people. This makes dispensationalism not only a theological curiosity but a dangerous political force that has justified decades of American military intervention in the Middle East.
If you have the working assumption that Christianity is not true—and you should, because no one should make any claim that they can’t back up with logic, reason, or evidence—then dispensationalism is pretty wild. It’s obviously similar to Mormonism, Scientology, and other arbitrary and cult-like speculation, and is separate perhaps from the actual Christian traditions that informed Europe. Dispensationalism is distinctly American, distinctly end-of-the-world-ish. But the world doesn’t end. There’s no big apocalypse ever. It never happens, no matter how many people predict it.
Let’s look at just a few examples: William Miller predicted the world would end on October 22, 1844—the “Great Disappointment” when Jesus didn’t return. Hal Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970) claimed the Rapture would happen in the 1980s based on Israel becoming a nation in 1948. Edgar Whisenant’s book “88 Reasons Why the Rapture Will Be in 1988” sold 4.5 million copies—and was completely wrong. Pat Robertson predicted the end of the world in 1982. Harold Camping predicted the Rapture would occur on May 21, 2011, convincing thousands of followers to quit their jobs and sell their possessions—only to recalculate it to October 21, 2011 when nothing happened. John Hagee declared that the “blood moon” tetrad of 2014-2015 signaled the end times. Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins’s “Left Behind” series (1995-2007) sold over 65 million copies, all based on dispensationalist end-times theology that has never come to pass. Before them, there was the Millerite movement, the Jehovah’s Witnesses predicting 1914, 1918, 1925, and 1975, and countless tent revival preachers claiming the end was near. Every single one of them was wrong. Every single time, Christians gave their money, their labor, their obedience to these prophets of doom, and every single time, the world kept turning.
That is because it benefits a small minority of Christians who are gaslighters, narcissists, people who want to control your mind, control your money, and control your labor—to trick you into believing that we’re near the end times and thus you don’t have to behave in accordance with any natural law or moral dictate.
The truth is Christianity is always promising the end times and always making it out like God is supporting the people who are in power, the people who are rich via the prosperity gospel, etc. Does that not harken to Roman power? Does that not harken to the Roman ideologies of might being right and wealth going to Caesar and so forth? If Donald Trump or any Gulfstream jet-owning slick evangelist were truly Christian, wouldn’t they do as Jesus said and give away their things to the poor and live a humble and modest life? They never do that, yet Christians, regardless of whether they think No True Scotsman is gonna get them out of it, always, always support these people. They support these people who, like Donald Trump, says his daughter is a piece of ass on Howard Stern, or like Jimmy Swaggart, are involved in sex scandals and embezzlement.
The first thing that you’re conceding when you say that you’re Christian is, once again, that you believe that a 2,000-year-old Jewish man is living in the sky with puppies and your grandma and you’re gonna meet them in the clouds when you die. That is a ludicrous conceptualization of the spiritual world—not for people who are raised with it like you and me, but for the vast majority of humans who have ever lived who never got anywhere near it.
Catholicism has several absolute batshit beliefs woven into it. One of them is transubstantiation, in which during the Eucharist, the little cracker and the wine—that cracker is supposed to transform into the actual body of Jesus Christ and the wine into his actual blood. It’s not metaphorical, and they say it’s not metaphorical. It’s literal. So every single person who has been baptized Catholic and taken the Eucharist is, by definition and by any possible iteration of understanding, a cannibal.
Christianity is measurably waning on the world stage, particularly in the West where it once held absolute cultural dominance. In the United States, the percentage of adults who identify as Christian dropped from 90% in 1972 to 63% in 2021 according to Pew Research Center. The decline is even more dramatic among younger generations—only 49% of Millennials and Gen Z identify as Christian. In Europe, the collapse is even more pronounced: in the UK, less than 40% now identify as Christian, down from over 70% just two decades ago. Church attendance has plummeted across the Western world, with weekly attendance in the U.S. dropping below 50% for the first time in recorded history. Meanwhile, the “nones”—those who identify as atheist, agnostic, or nothing in particular—have grown from 5% in 1972 to 29% in 2021, making them the fastest-growing “religious” category in America. This isn’t a temporary trend; every measure of religious affiliation, belief, and practice shows Christianity losing its grip on Western culture.
Remarkably, as Christianity has declined, society has not descended into the moral chaos that Christian leaders predicted. In fact, the opposite has occurred.
Violent crime in the United States peaked in the early 1990s and has declined significantly since then. According to FBI statistics, the violent crime rate in 2019 was approximately half of what it was in 1991, despite the U.S. population growing by over 70 million people during that same period. Murder rates, rape rates, and aggravated assault rates have all fallen dramatically during the exact same period when Christianity’s cultural dominance collapsed and the percentage of non-religious Americans exploded.
This isn’t correlation without causation—it directly contradicts the Christian claim that their religion is necessary for a moral society. If Christianity were truly the foundation of morality, we would expect crime to skyrocket as religious affiliation plummeted. Instead, we see the opposite. Because it was mainly Christianity that created a good-evil duality in the mind of the initiate that set them on a path to perceive everything in accordance with that binary.
The evidence suggests that secular, pluralistic societies with strong social safety nets, quality education, and economic opportunity produce less violence than religiously homogeneous societies with high inequality and weak institutions.
Countries like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Japan—some of the least religious nations on Earth—consistently rank among the safest and most peaceful societies in human history, with murder rates a fraction of the highly Christian United States. The American Bible Belt, meanwhile, has higher rates of violent crime, poverty, teen pregnancy, divorce, and infant mortality than less religious regions of the country. Christianity doesn’t create morality or reduce violence—it simply takes credit for the moral progress that secular Enlightenment values, human rights frameworks, and evidence-based policymaking have achieved. As Christianity continues to decline, society doesn’t fall apart. It gets better.
Freemasons, who are unquestionably woven into the same architecture as Christianity in terms of power in the United States, have a different way of perceiving the spiritual energies that push us left or right. In all Masonic architecture, you can see two pillars—Jachin and Boaz—and one represents the sun and the other represents the moon. The active signs in astrology are the fire and air signs. The passive signs are the earth and water signs. If you do the charts of yourself and all your friends, you will find that people with a lot of lunar energy—earth and water energy—are different than people with a lot of solar energy—air or fire energy.
The air and fire people are active, and they want to be outdoorsy and they want to argue about stuff and they want to be physically healthy and they want to be virtuous, and they want to be upright, and they want to work, and they want to travel the world and talk about ideas. The passive or lunar signs want to cultivate. They’re defensive against somebody impeding their space or forcing them to do something they don’t want to do, such as get up early or work hard. They’re emotional. They’re feminine, as things that are lunar are feminine in almost every mythology in the entire world.
Moon-ruled people pretty much fall into the category of Democrat or leftist. The sun-ruled people pretty much fall into the category of Republican or conservative, with few exceptions. They use this spiritual truth to control people by controlling the very dialectic, which is the means of arguing to begin with.
Michel Foucault used the Panopticon as a metaphor to explain power in modernity. In a Marxist way, you believe that the world is run by conflict—the people in power own the companies or the factories, you work for them, and if you were to overthrow them, there’d be violence and killing and so forth. But if you don’t overthrow them, you’ll be working for them your whole life, and they will degrade your quality of life and they will trick you through psyops and so forth into continuing to believe their paradigm that benefits only them. That is all true, but that was for the age of the industrial revolution and so forth. Michel Foucault’s paradigm—the Panopticon—is that you’re in a prison. You can’t even see the walls of the prison. You can’t see outside the prison. And you definitely don’t see the wardens. The wardens see you, though, and can control you thusly. That is a more accurate paradigm, especially for the United States and especially under corporatism.
Above are several Christians ready to argue online.
The movie Star Wars was so hugely popular not because it was a typical hero’s journey, but because it was a kind of unorthodox one created by an Aquarius moon, George Lucas. The thing about Star Wars is that the rebels are the heroes. It’s a miniature revolution story with the old guard being mechanical and robotic like Darth Vader, having an evil, wicked magic.
This is all a Saturn myth if you understand astrotheology. The point is to get rid of the old way because it’s corporate and mechanical, with young, intrepid, moral, and white magical heroes that were rebels. That is a very good entrance into the 21st century on how to understand astrotheology, how to understand the true compass for good and evil in this world today.
Christianity decided what Christian’s concept of good and evil was, and the world became an evil, violent place.
The Dark Ages. The Conquistadors. The Nazi Party. None would exist without Christianity, and Christianity is the direct cause of all.
The version of Christianity has degraded, demented, and degenerated into a form that will accept four million people being killed in the Middle East in its name. It is no different than the Roman planetary religion that allowed all of the degeneracy of Rome to be supported. It’s no different. Modern America is just like classical Rome, and it will fall like classical Rome.
Jesus Christ is not up in the clouds saying, “I’m gonna fix it all.” What it is, is that some people have been fooled by the Roman psyop of Christianity into believing that they don’t have to live responsibly, ethically, or in a virtuous manner because they’ll always be forgiven by Jesus Christ. Then, when that philosophy reaches its logical end, as in rape, theft, murder as done by Christians, Christians again play No True Scotsman instead of witnessing the correlation between Catholic or Christian thought and certain repeat crimes.
But here’s the truth of the matter: According to Catholic doctrine, if Hitler one second before he shot himself said, “Please, Jesus Christ, take me into heaven. I’m sorry. I’m a sinner, and I must be forgiven,” he would be in heaven. But Anne Frank, who was never baptized, an innocent child who lived under the most wicked regime in Western history, could never go to heaven—despite being slaughtered by an ostensibly Catholic organization—because she was not baptized. That is how Catholics think.
There has been a rush to create a new kind of mythology like Star Wars or many other things that come to life through video games and films—a new kind of mythology that might accentuate or support Aquarian philosophy because we are entering the Age of Aquarius. But whereas Christianity was the true compassionate, heart-centered, spiritual masterpiece of the beginning of the last age, now it has become the Darth Vader—the wicked, cold, forgotten-itself behemoth that sways back and forth, stumbling around in its drunkenness of power and allowing child molesters, colonialists, racists, rapists, murderers of all kinds, militaries, everything else, to do all of their horrors in its name.
Christian Violence Toll:
The Crusades (1095-1291) Estimates range from 1 to 3 million deaths. This includes combatants and civilians on all sides of the conflicts across nearly 200 years of religious warfare initiated by Christian Europe against Muslims, Jews, and other Christians deemed heretical.
The Inquisitions (1184-1834) The Spanish Inquisition directly executed approximately 3,000 to 5,000 people. The total European Inquisitions executed roughly 6,000 to 8,000 people. When extended to include deaths from torture, imprisonment, and the broader colonial inquisitions in Spanish territories throughout the Americas, the death toll reaches potentially 500,000 to 1 million people.
Colonization of the Americas (1492-1900) The pre-Columbian population of the Americas stood at approximately 145 million people in 1491. By 1691, only 6 million remained. This represents a 90-95% mortality rate with a total population loss of 130 to 145 million Indigenous people. Disease accounted for 60-75% of these deaths, including smallpox, measles, typhus, and other epidemics. Direct violence, slavery, and forced labor accounted for 25-40% of deaths, translating to roughly 50 to 56 million people killed directly by colonial brutality. Colonial systems of slavery and forced labor made populations more susceptible to disease, and Europeans sometimes deliberately spread disease. The distinction between disease deaths and violence deaths is misleading since colonial violence created the conditions for epidemics to flourish.
The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) Approximately 8 million people died in this religious conflict between Catholics and Protestants across Europe.
French Wars of Religion (1562-1598) Between 2 and 4 million people died in these conflicts between Catholics and Huguenots in France.
Other European Religious Conflicts (Various periods) Approximately 1 to 2 million deaths across various smaller religious wars and persecutions throughout European history.
Witch Trials (1450-1750) Between 40,000 and 60,000 people were executed, with women constituting the vast majority of victims. These trials were driven by Church-endorsed doctrines and occurred across Europe and colonial America.
African Slave Trade (1500s-1800s) The Middle Passage alone resulted in 1 to 2 million deaths. The total deaths from the Atlantic slave trade, including deaths in Africa during capture and transport, reached 10 to 15 million people. This entire system was justified and perpetuated by Christian doctrine and implemented primarily by Christian nations.
Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229) Between 200,000 and 1 million Cathars were killed in southern France. This was the first Crusade intended to exterminate other Christians. Pope Innocent III ordered the complete destruction of the Cathar population. The massacre at Béziers alone claimed between 20,000 and 70,000 lives in a single day.
Belgian Congo under King Leopold II (1885-1908) Approximately 10 million Congolese people died under the brutal colonial regime of Catholic King Leopold II of Belgium. Deaths resulted from murder, starvation, exhaustion, and disease caused by forced labor in rubber plantations.
Various Colonial Massacres in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific (1500s-1900s) Between 5 and 10 million people died in various colonial genocides, forced labor systems, and punitive expeditions carried out by Christian European powers across their colonial empires.
Croatian Ustasha Regime (1941-1945) Between 300,000 and 600,000 Orthodox Serbs, Jews, and Roma were killed by the Catholic fascist Ustasha regime in Croatia during World War II. Many killers were Franciscan friars. Victims were burned alive in kilns, stabbed, slain, or shot. The Pope knew about these events and did nothing to prevent them.
Rwandan Genocide (1994) Approximately 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were killed. Anglican and Catholic clergy were actively involved in the massacres. Some priests and nuns participated directly in murders, while church buildings that should have been sanctuaries became death traps.
War on Terror (2001-present) Approximately 4 million indirect deaths have resulted from the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and related conflicts. While not exclusively religious, these wars were partly justified by Christian rhetoric and received overwhelming support from evangelical Christians in America.
Taiping Rebellion (1850-1864) Between 20 and 30 million people died in this conflict. It was led by Hong Xiuquan, who claimed to be Jesus Christ’s younger brother and sought to establish a Christian theocracy in China. The classification of this as Christian violence is debated since it involved syncretic religious beliefs mixing Christianity with Chinese traditions.
Native American Genocide in the United States (1600s-1900s) The Native American population in what is now the United States declined from approximately 5 to 10 million to fewer than 250,000 by 1900. Direct warfare killed approximately 30,000 to 45,000 Native Americans according to official records, but this vastly undercounts deaths from massacres, forced relocations like the Trail of Tears, deliberate disease spreading, starvation, and the destruction of food sources like buffalo herds. The total death toll likely exceeds 2 to 5 million when including deaths from forced relocation, reservation conditions, and residential schools.
Residential Schools in Canada and the United States (1870s-1990s) Tens of thousands of Indigenous children died in Christian-run residential schools designed to eradicate Indigenous cultures. Children were forcibly removed from their families, forbidden to speak their languages, subjected to physical and sexual abuse, and died from disease, malnutrition, and neglect. Many were buried in unmarked graves.
Australian Aboriginal Genocide (1788-1930s) Between 20,000 and 100,000 Aboriginal Australians were killed through frontier violence, poisonings, and massacres carried out by Christian colonists. The Stolen Generations policy, endorsed by Christian churches, forcibly removed Aboriginal children from their families.
Goa Inquisition (1560-1812) Between 1560 and 1774, approximately 16,202 people were brought to trial. Of these, 57 were sentenced to death and executed, with another 64 burned in effigy. Thousands more died from torture and imprisonment.
Conquistador Campaigns in Central and South America (1500s-1600s) Spanish and Portuguese conquests resulted in 10 to 15 million indigenous deaths through violence, forced labor in mines and plantations, and diseases introduced by colonizers. Missionary campaigns led to forced conversions, and resistance was met with extreme violence justified by papal decrees.
Conservative Total Estimate Approximately 150 to 200 million deaths can be attributed to Christian-justified violence, colonization, and religious wars throughout history.
Expanded Estimate Potentially 200 to 300 million deaths when including all deaths resulting from Christian colonial systems, even when disease was the proximate cause, since colonial slavery and forced labor systems created the conditions that prevented populations from surviving or recovering from epidemics.
